1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 8/17/21, LPA interviewed administrator regarding the above allegation. She stated Clients C1 and C2 were given a 30-day eviction notice on 8/13/2021. She stated client’s conservator would always come to the facility and not abiding Covid-19 visitation guidelines. She stated the when the Conservator come to the facility or calls C1-C2 will get disruptive. She stated eviction notice was issued on 8/12/21. On 8/20/2021, LPA received an amendment of the eviction notices for C1-C2. Based on interviews conducted and documents review the administrator did not follow Title 22’s eviction procedures, clients evicted for conservator and not house rules.
LPA did not interview Clients C1-C3 due to them not being able to communicate. On 9/28/21, LPA Brown attempted to interview Client C4, but client did not want to continue with investigation
Substantiated: Based on Investigators interviews which were conducted with reporting party, administrator and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division (6) are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D.
Exit interview conducted, appeal rights were discussed, and a copy of this report was provided to Ashley Acosta, the Administrator.
|