1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On December 11, 2025, and January 16, 2026, between 10:00 AM and 4:09 PM, the Department conducted interviews with two staff members, referred to as Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2). Both staff members claimed that the allegation is false.
(S1), who is responsible for duties Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM to 8:00 PM, stated that there has never been an issue with (S1’s) availability to respond promptly when clients return from daily outings. (S2) affirmed that the facility has sufficient staff members working three shifts to adequately care for and supervise clients throughout the day.
On January 5, 2026, January 7, 2026, and January 16, 2026, from 10:00 AM to 3:39 PM, the Department conducted interviews with five witnesses, referred to as Witness #1 through Witness #5 (W1-W5). Four (4) out of the five (5) witnesses could not support the claim in question. Furthermore, (W3-W5) reported that they had no issues or concerns regarding any staff members or the services provided to clients. They have never observed inadequate care or supervision by the staff at this facility.
A review of Client #1 (C1’s) service records included Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 08/22/15), Functional Capability Assessment LIC 9172 (dated 08/22/15), Preplacement Appraisal Information LIC 603 (dated 03/26/21), Admissions Agreement (dated 8/22/15), South Central Los Angeles Regional Center Individual Program Plan (dated 07/25/24), Physicians Report LIC 602 (dated 01/30/25), Road community Care Clinic Report (dated 10/15/25), Monthly Weight Tracking (dated 01/25 through 11/25), Quarterly Nursing Progress Note (dated 11/24 through 01/25), and Medication Administration Record (dated 10/1/25 through 10/31/25). Further review of facility records included: Weekly Meal Planner (dated 10/25 & 11/25), Meeting In-Service Training (dated 01/25), Staff Communication Log (dated 10/02/25 through 12/3/25), and Employee Schedule (dated 09/25 through 11/25).
Based on information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
Based on the information gathered from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. The allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Ashley Acosta, and copies were provided.
|