1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate food service for residents.
RP stated that R1 has a modified diet prescribed by the doctor due to high blood pressure, and diabetes.
Rp states that the facility serves high salt food content such as soups, lots of Pork, and does not serve fresh fruits or vegetables. Record Review of R1 revealed that a modified diet was indicated of liquid, but did not indicate by a physicians prescription perimeters of food other than liquid. On 04/01/22 during physical tour LPA observed Fresh foods such as cabbage, lettuce, tomatoes, onion, bananas, orange, apples, celery, bell pepper, bread, snap peas, milk, apple sauce, oatmeal, cantaloupe, and some chicken, pork, frozen veggies, in the freezer. Record Review of other clients in care physician’s report revealed that no other residents have a modified diet.
Therefore, Based on LPA’s Observation, Record Review, and Interviews the Department Finds that “Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.”
Regarding the Allegation: Resident Care Needs are not being Met
RP stated that the facility’s female staff did not want to help assist R1 with toileting and change of diaper, because staff felt it was inappropriate, in turn causing r1 to have to wait until a male staff was available. House Manager stated that they respect the privacy of residents, and that if resident feels comfortable either sex of a care giver they will move forward with assisting. LPA interview residents r2-r3. R2, and R3 stated that they don’t have any issue with staff assisting with their needs. R2, and R3 stated that they feel comfortable with male and female caregiver’s assistance and receive both.
Based on LPA’s Observation, Record Review, and Interviews the Department Finds that “Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.”
|