1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation: Facility is in disrepair.
It is alleged that on 1/09/24, it was reported that there was a leak in R1’s room, which left the room floor wet and plumbers came to repair it by cutting into the wall. Per interviews conducted, (5) of (5) staff admitted to there being a leak in R1’s room. Per S2, S2 went to inspect the leak when it was reported and contacted a plumbing company the same day. Per interviews conducted, (3) of (4) residents could not corroborate the allegation. The plumber’s work invoice dated: 1/12/24, indicates that between 1/09/24-1/12/24, repairs took place in R1’s room where the drywall area was cut out, damaged piping was cut out, and the shower’s drain was replaced with a new one. It was tested and observed to no longer be leaking. This reflects that the reparations took three days to complete. LPA inspected R1’s room and observed a large mat placed over the piece of the carpet that was allegedly wet. LPA also observed a piece of the wall next to R1’s bed that appears to have been cut out in a square and replaced with a newer one, as it has a different color of the original wall. The square has tape placed all around and is held with nails. The bathroom shower also has exposed green drywall all around the edges of it. Per S1 and S3, the reparations will be completed sometime next week by another company as they will be doing professional cleaning due to mold that was found on the wall when the wall was cut out to complete the plumbing reparations.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found to be Substantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, deficiencies are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |