1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facility has inadequate supplies- It is alleged that the facility does not have adequate hygiene supplies for clients. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied this allegation. Due to cognitive impairments, LPA Ramirez was unable to interview three (3) out of four (4) clients present during the visit. LPA Ramirez observed several bottles of 3 in 1 shampoo, conditioner and body wash in the facility hallway closet. LPA Ramirez observed several boxes of adult diapers and changing pads in the hallway closet. Administrator ESTANISLAO provided LPA Ramirez with receipts of hygiene products the facility buys. LPA Ramirez observed eleven (11) bottles of shower gel, itemized on receipt dated 01/05/2024. LPA Ramirez observed two weeks of requested and delivered facility grocery list. LPA Ramirez observed staff requested and received various toiletry products and cleaning solutions. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Staff yelled at client- It is alleged staff yell at clients in care. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied this allegation. One (1) out of three (3) nearby neighbors (W1-W3) confirm this allegation. Due to cognitive impairments, LPA Ramirez was unable to interview three (3) out of four (4) clients present during the visit. LPA Ramirez contacted Claremont Police Department (CPD) on 01/10/2024, to confirm if noise complaints or noise disturbance were ever filed against the facility. According to CPD, records did not indicate a noise complaint was ever filed against the facility address. LPA Ramirez observed facility policy on “Acknowledgement of Harassment Policy” that staff signed upon employment. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Staff sleep while on duty- It is alleged staff sleep while on duty. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied this allegation. Due to cognitive impairments, LPA Ramirez was unable to interview three (3) out of four (4) clients present during the visit. LPA Ramirez requested and obtained PM timecard for seven (7) PM staff. LPA Ramirez did not observe any irregularities on timecards. LPA Ramirez observed facility policy on “Resident Supervision Policy” that staff signed upon employment. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Staff falsified documents- It is alleged staff falsified documents. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied this allegation. Due to cognitive impairments, LPA Ramirez was unable to interview three (3) out of four (4) clients present during the visit. LPA Ramirez reviewed facility file and did not observe any irregularities. Staff records and client files are maintained at the facility. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeals rights was provided.
|