1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on observation, and interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff are not following resident's special dietary needs. It is being alleged that staff do not ensure R1 is provided with an adequate amount of liquids, and that staff does not ensure R1 receives food of sufficient quality. It is also being alleged that staff are not following R1’s dietary restrictions. On 11/05/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with staff S1-S3. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation.
On 11/05/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with residents R1-R3 and attempted to interview R4 but were unable to as they were sleeping. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 residents denied the allegation. 3 out of 3 residents said they receive 3 meals a day, with snacks in between. 3 out of 3 residents said they are receiving good nutritious meals daily at the facility. 3 out of 3 residents said they are receiving an adequate amount of liquids daily.
On 02/03/26, LPA Gonzalez conducted a review of R1’s Needs and Service Plan dated: 01/02/26. Per service plan, R1 requires a special low sodium diet. On 12/29/25 LPA conducted a tour of the kitchen facility, LPA observed all special diets, and dietary needs are printed and displayed on kitchen wall. The Kitchen staff also have a binder with all residents and their dietary needs.
Based on observation, and interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident received a copy of the admissions agreement. It is being alleged that R1 and/or their responsible party never received a copy of the admissions agreement. On 11/05/25, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with staff S1-S3. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 3 staff denied the allegation.
Continued on LIC9099-C |