1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was noted that R1 had a loss of appetite, body weakness, and overall cognitive and physical decline. On 12/03/24, a hospice nurse observed Stage 2 injuries on R1’s coccyx and spine. On 12/18/24, a wound care agency assessed R1 to have a Stage 4 injury on their back and a Stage 3 injury on their sacrum. Both injuries were noted to be unrelated to R1’s hospice diagnosis. R1’s hospice care plan was also not updated to include the wound care and excisional debridement performed by the wound care agency. Interview with the administrator at 1:30 p.m. on 01/03/25 revealed staff were instructed to reposition R1 every two (02) hours but not to transfer them due to skin integrity issues. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) at 2:00 p.m. on 01/03/25 confirmed that all staff had been trained by the hospice agency on R1’s care. S1 repositioned R1 every two (02) hours, assisted with incontinence care, and ensured their back and coccyx were dry and free of redness. LPA was unable to interview R1. Interviews with three (03) out of three (03) other residents interviewed revealed they had no issues with pressure injuries. Interview with Resident #2 (R2) at 2:25 p.m. on 01/03/25 revealed S1 reminds them to reposition themselves often. Based on interviews and record review, although R1’s pressure injuries were appropriately cared for by R1’s hospice agency and facility staff, the facility should have applied for an exception to retain R1 in the facility while they received wound treatment unrelated to their hospice diagnosis. Therefore, the allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Deficiency is cited on the LIC 9099-D page.
Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided. |