1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation reveals the following: In regard to “Administrator is not allowing resident to have visit”. The details of this allegation state that the facility is not allowing visitations without appointments. LPA observed a family member visiting a client while conducting the investigation. House rules stated families can visit any time and they can visit during planned activities if visitors do not infringe upon the rights of other clients. LPA confirmed page 61 of the plan of operation stated, “Clients may have visitors at the facility at any time”. File review for C1 confirmed there is no restraining order on file. LPA also observed visitation logs for the last 5 months and confirmed that all clients are receiving visitations, but C1 family member has set appointments. C1 family member confirmed schedule visitations is an issue due to aging and transportation. C1 family member was placed on a visitation schedule, only Tuesdays and Fridays from 10/10:30 am - 1/1:30 pm. The Facility issued a visitation schedule to C1 family member, that was signed by all staff, C1’s family member and assistant administrator. Assistant administrator confirmed set appointments for C1 family member. 3/3 staff confirmed C1 family has set appointments
Based on LPA observation, interviews and file review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulation, Title 22 are being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
Exit Interview Conducted with assistant administrator Jasmin Tomines/ Appeal Rights Provided / A Copy of the Report Issued |