1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S2 was present to calm down C2. According to S2, they did not witness C2 hit C1. Shortly after, S1 arrived to the facility and noticed a discoloration on C1's face. Staff provided first aid care and called C1's family to notify of the discoloration. Staff was unaware of how the injury was caused, as C1 is non verbal and could not communicate and C2 denied knowing what happened. Staff attempted to take C1 to an urgent care as advised by C1's conservator but they were closed. Staff called the 24/7 nurse hotline and were recommended to just ice the area and schedule a visit with the clients doctor. On 6/13 a behaviorist for the facility had a meeting with C2 who then admitted to hitting C1 with her tablet. Once the facility became aware, they notified C1 and C2's placement agency as well as licensing. C1 was taken to their physician on 6/14 and it was advised to just keep a warm pack around the injury area and no need to go to the hospital. LPA contacted the placement agency which stated they were aware of the incident and do not believe the staff or facility is at fault. Review of client files do not show that clients require a 1 on 1 staff supervision. Facility staff provided first aid and followed up on the injury as well. Based on statements and interviews conducted with clients and staff as well as LPAs documents reviewed, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore all the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with administrator Cristina Caballes and Licensee Angelo Caballes and a hard copy was provided. |