1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 05/10/24, between 10:37 am – 11::01 am, the Department interviewed resident #1 (R1). (R1) stated that this matter has been rectified. However, when presented with a copy of a Notice Letter of Rate Increase for 2024, (R1) could not recall ever receiving a copy.
On 05/10/24, between 11:05 am – 11:31 am, the Department interviewed business manager staff #1 (S1). (S1) provided a copy of the Notice Letter of Rate Increase that was presented to (R1) in late October 2023. (S1) claimed that all residents received the Notice Letter of Rate Increase effective 01/01/24, in person or it was placed inside their mailboxes.
On 05/10/24, between 11:32 am – 12:05 pm, the Department interviewed (7) out of (7) residents #2 - #8 (R2-R8). Four (4) out of seven (7) claimed to have received the Notice Letter of Rate Increase. Three (3) out of seven (7) could not recall or claimed not to have received the notice.
On 05/10/24, between 12:10 pm – 12:37 pm, the Department interviewed administrator #1 (A1). (A1) verified that it was (A1’s) signature on the Notice Letter of Rate Increase distributed to all the residents residing at Burbank Senior Villa East. Nevertheless, (A1) did not observe that a date was omitted from the letter generated by the business office. (A1) reported aside from a written notice given to the residents, the topic of rate increase for 2024 was presented during the Resident Council Meeting held on 09/25/24.
A review of the Notice Letter of Rate Increase revealed it did not have a date, though it did not appear to be altered. Resident Council Meeting Log indicated that the topic of rate increase for January 2024 was discussed at the meeting. Based on the information gathered, there is no sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation mentioned above. The Department could not obtain additional statements related to the allegations in this complaint from family member (W1) due to unreturned calls.
Based on the information collected, an inspection of the facility, observation and interviews conducted, and an analysis of records reviewed, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned in this complaint. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited.
An exit interview is conducted with Imelda Villanueva and a copy of the report is provided.
|