<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 198603136
Report Date: 07/24/2026
Date Signed: 07/24/2026 12:35:41 PM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
WOODLAND HILLS S.RO, 21731 VENTURA BLVD., STE. 250
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
07/10/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Nadia Shahbazian
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 31-AS-20260710110726
FACILITY NAME:SAVANT OF BURBANK EASTFACILITY NUMBER:
198603136
ADMINISTRATOR:VILLANUEVA,IMELDAFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:1900 GRISMER AVETELEPHONE:
(818) 843-3141
CITY:BURBANKSTATE: CAZIP CODE:
91504
CAPACITY:100CENSUS: 92DATE:
07/24/2026
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
09:30 AM
MET WITH:Imelda Villanueva-Executive DirectorTIME COMPLETED:
12:35 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff did not shower resident in care
Staff did not ensure that the resident's incontinence care needs were properly met at the facility
Staff did not keep the resident's room free of pests
Staff did not provide proper transfer assistance to residents in care
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nadia Shahbazian conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation(s). LPA met with Imelda Villanueva-Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit is to close out the investigation and render findings.

Initial investigation was conducted by LPA Shahbazian on 07/14/26. LPA had previously requested documents pertaining to the investigation and had interviewed residents and staff.

At approximately 9:40am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the common areas and kitchen; no immediate health or safety risks were observed during today's visit.

In regards to allegation: Staff did not shower resident in care. It is alleged that: Resident #1 (R1)’s Monday shower was skipped by a caregiver. LPA's interviews revealed the following: The Administrator stated that there are (5) caregivers assigned to am and pm shifts and 2 or more caregivers during night

Continued on 9099-C
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Mary G Flores
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Nadia Shahbazian
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 3
Control Number 31-AS-20260710110726
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
WOODLAND HILLS S.RO, 21731 VENTURA BLVD., STE. 250
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364
FACILITY NAME: SAVANT OF BURBANK EAST
FACILITY NUMBER: 198603136
VISIT DATE: 07/24/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
shift but if there is a staff shortage, staff from other shifts or agency staff are called in for assistance. Administrator stated staff shower residents two times a week or more, if accidents occur. There are times that residents refuse to be showered but staff return at a later time to shower residents and if refused again, staff notate the refusal. (7) Caregivers and (1) witness stated they are assigned to 12-16 residents per shift, of whom only 7-8 residents need total assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)s and approximately 7-8 residents are independent. All staff interviewed stated they ensure residents are showered two times a week or more, if accidents occur, sometimes even several times a day. In addition all (7) staff mentioned if residents refuse to be showered, staff return at a later time to shower residents and if refused again, staff notate refusal log, but refusal rarely happens. LPA interviews with residents revealed the following: (4) residents stated they are capable of showering themselves and using the restroom on their own. (5) residents stated staff assist them with showering two times or more per week, changing them and assisting with other needs. During interview with R1, they did not recall the exact showering schedule but stated staff shower them at least two or three times a week and did not have any concerns. LPA reviewed the shower logs for months of June and July 2026 and did not notice that R1’s shower needs were not met.

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

In regards to allegation: Staff did not ensure that the resident's incontinence care needs were properly met at the facility. It is alleged that several residents had double diapers, including Resident 1 (R1), who was not kept clean. LPA's interviews revealed the following: The Administrator stated that there are (5) caregivers assigned to am and pm shifts and 2 or more caregivers during night shift but if there is a staff shortage, staff from other shifts or agency staff are called in for assistance. (7) caregivers and (1) witness stated they are assigned to 12-16 residents per shift, of whom only 7-8 residents need total assistance with ADLs and approximately 7-8 residents are independent and capable of managing their own ADLs. All (7) staff stated they ensure residents are usually clean and dry, when they start their shifts. They check on residents with incontinence needs every hour, sometimes residents are taken to the bathroom or sometimes changed in bed. Sometimes residents have accidents in bed, even several times a day and they are always cleaned, changed and clothing or bed sheets are changed. All (7) staff and (1) witness stated they make sure residents’ incontinence clothing are always clean and dry and they never put on double diapers. LPA interviews with residents revealed the following: R1 stated staff always check on R1 and make sure pull ups are clean, otherwise they clean R1 and pull up are changed and R1 is never double diapered.

Continued on 9099-C

SUPERVISORS NAME: Mary G Flores
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Nadia Shahbazian
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 3
Control Number 31-AS-20260710110726
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
WOODLAND HILLS S.RO, 21731 VENTURA BLVD., STE. 250
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364
FACILITY NAME: SAVANT OF BURBANK EAST
FACILITY NUMBER: 198603136
VISIT DATE: 07/24/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
(4) residents stated they use the restrooms by themselves. (4) residents stated staff check on them every hour and especially after meals to ensure their toileting needs are met, staff take them to use the restroom, clean and change their pull ups but they have never been double diapered.

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

In regards to allegation: Staff did not keep the resident's room free of pests. It is alleged that there were roaches in one of rooms. LPA interviewed the Administrator and Maintenance Director, who stated that staff or residents notify them of any issues in resident rooms or common areas and a maintenance order is placed. Maintenance Director stated a professional pest control company comes to the facility, twice a month, once in the morning and one at night, for preventive measures. The pest control company is responsible for addressing any rodent or insect issues but there has been no issues since end of last year. The pest control company uses chemicals safe for humans. LPA interviewed (7) staff and (10) residents who stated they have not seen any infestations in rooms or common areas. LPA visited common areas, kitchen and multiple rooms in both floors and did not observe any insects or signs of infestation.

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

In regards to allegation: Staff did not provide proper transfer assistance to residents in care. It is alleged that transfers for patients that cannot bear weight are done without any hoyer lifts, which is both risking the caregiver and the patient's safety. LPA's interviews revealed the following: The Administrator stated facility only has two residents that are heavy and require 2-3 staff assistance for transfer. All staff, including the agency staff are trained in transferring, lifting and repositioning residents and there are continuous training on resident care. Facility has a mechanical hoyer lift and transfer boards, which staff sometime use to transfer heavy or non-weight bearing residents but generally caregivers ask each other for assistance if needed. Interviews with (7) caregivers and (1) witness stated they are assigned to 7-8 residents in need of total assistance with ADLs and they are capable of transferring themselves to beds, showers and wheelchairs and don’t require 2-3 staff transferring assistance. All staff interviewed mentioned that they prefer to assist the residents themselves and generally do not use the hoyer lift but if they need help, they communicate with other caregivers to transfer residents. LPA Interviewed (10) residents, (5) residents stated that are independent. (5) residents mentioned generally they are able to transfer or reposition themselves but staff always assist them for safety purposes.

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

Exit interview was conducted with and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Mary G Flores
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Nadia Shahbazian
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/24/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 3 of 3