1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The administrator state during the late evening of 12/23/19 It was discovered that R1's pendant was non-operational. A caregiver took the pendant, left it for the administrator to repair the pendant and returned it back to R1 during the AM shift on the next day. Based on the evidence: interview conducted the finding is unsubstantiated.
Staff confiscated resident's call button: R1's call button was broken and staff gave her a new one. M1 state that when a resident push the Emergency Response Button, staff go to the residents areas as soon a possible. During the course of the visit (via Facetime) the LPA randomly selected by directing M1 to test the Emergency Assistance System at 4:20 PM in one of the resident bedrooms. The LPA and M1 observed that a caregiver arrived to the bedroom at, 4:25 PM. All residents state that they have used the Emergency Assistance System and staff came to their location right away. All residents deny pushing the Emergency Assistance Button and it took staff/caregivers an hour to arrive to provide assistance. Based on interviews conducted and visual observations the finding is unsubstantiated. Resident not provided assistance with incontinence care: the administrator, S1 and S2 state the incontinent residents diapers are changed as often as needed. S2 has changed R1's diaper. S1 also state that diapers are changed at least 5 to 6 times on his shifts. S2 further state her duties include; getting them up and check diapers. R1, R2, R3, R6, R7, R11, R12, R13 and R14 are incontinent. All incontinent residents state that they are checked and changed throughout the day. All incontinent residents deny that their incontinent needs are not being met.
FM state, that a member or two of their family visit the center almost daily. "The caregivers maintain my father's hygiene, ensure his medications are given as instructed per the physician's orders. My father is not incontinent. But he did fall a few days ago and called for staff by pushing the button. He said the staff came right away and they called my sister the same night he fell. My father's bedroom does not have an unpleasant odor. The linens are changed daily and his room cleaned. The state of California, Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing investigated the allegations of; resident not provided clean linens, resident's room is malodorous, resident is not being bathed, staff not administering resident's medications as prescribed, staff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance, staff confiscated resident's call button and resident not provided assistance with incontinence care. The finding based on the evidence; interviews conducted, visual observations, records reviewed and medications, the finding is unsubstantiated. Reviewed medications, medical records, interviewed the administrator, caregivers, housekeeper, 14 residents medication technicians were interviewed. The Emergency Assistance System was tested and staff arrived to the resident's bedroom in 5 minutes. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the complaint investigation of the allegations is unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22, An exit Interview was conducted via telephone with the administrator and a hardcopy was provided via email for signature. Signatures on hardcopies. |