1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (1) of (6) residents interviewed stated clothes has gone missing from their possession but was not sure who took it. Staff interviews deny stealing any personal possessions from residents in care. Based on interviews and observations; although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation "Facility staff member did not respect residents' privacy by knocking on their door before entering their room." it was alleged that S2 enters residents rooms without knocking or permission. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that staff will go from room to room for multiple reason throughout the day. There are clients who need assistance with medication, assistance with grooming, and assistance in room cleaning. Staff will also conduct room checks when residents are not responsive to door knocks. Interview with S2 denies that they have ever entered a residents room without knocking and identifying first. LPA was not provided with proof of S2 entering resident rooms unannounced. During the visit, LPA observed S2 knock on doors and announce themselves before entering. Based on interviews and observations; although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation "Facility staff did not seek a resident timely medical attention." it was alleged that facility staff did not call 911 in a timely manner for R2. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. File review shows that R2 had a fall in the dinning room on 3/1/23 and also receives assistance from a hospice agency. Incident report collected states that the resident received first aid and their hospice agency was contacted and also was taken to the hospital. Interview with R2 corroborates the information on the incident report. Interviews show that S3 immediately assisted and assessed R2 then contacted responsible parties. Hospice agency determined it would be best for R2 to go to the hospital and so they were taken. During interview, R2 stated they agreed to wait for the hospice agencies decision about going to the hospital. Based on interviews, observations, and files reviewed; although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |