1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report supersedes the original report created on 3/27/2023. Reason for supersede is to ensure report accurately refers to residents interviewed. Findings have not changed.***
(6) of (6) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that R1's responsible party contacted the facility multiple times to speak with the management. Specific dates were not provided to LPA. Interviews with staff show that due to the nature of questions asked by R1's responsible party, the administrator or facilities legal department would be the ones to address R1's responsible party. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation "Facility staff forced resident/representative to sign inappropriate document(s) while in care" it was alleged that S1 attempted to force R1 to sign new house rules and level of care plan . (6) of (6) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff deny forcing any residents in care to sign documents for any reason. Interview with R1 stated they denied signing any forms provided by S1. Review of R1's file did not show any documents that R1 was forced to sign. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation "Facility staff are not protecting resident(s) from other resident in care." it was alleged that staff was not protecting residents from R2. (6) of (6) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews stated that R2 has recently become disruptive and aggressive while in living in the facility. Interviews with residents stated that anytime R2 had an incident, staff was able to separate R2 immediately and address the situation. File review shows documentation of incidents dated 9/3/22 and 9/7/22 involving R2 were reported and completed timely. Cops were called on both incidents but R2 was not arrested. File review shows that R2 was also served an eviction notice on 9/19/22 for violating facility rules. Review of R2's file did not show that they needed a 1 on 1 or 24/hr supervision. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |