1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation "Resident rooms are unsanitary" it was alleged that R3's room was malodorous and R1's bathroom was dirty. (8) of (8) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews stated that R3 is a resident who refuses to shower for extended periods of time and it is not the room the smells. Rooms are cleaned daily and R3 is also reminded daily to take a shower but they refuse. R3 confirmed to LPA that they do not like to shower and did not want to shower. R3 did not need assistance with showering and was independent. LPA observed R3 refusing to shower or wanting assistance with showers during the initial visit. LPA did not observe the hallways to be malodorous during the initial and subsequent visit as the smell was coming from a resident and not the facility. LPA observed R1 to have a private bedroom with a private bathroom in the facility. LPA observed the bathroom to be clean and appear unused. LPA was not provided with proof of the resident rooms being unsanitary. Based on interviews, file review, and observation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated
In regards to the allegation "Staff are using resident's bathroom" it was alleged that staff were using R1's private bathroom. (8) of (8) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff deny using R1s room for their own personal break time. Staff denied using any residents bathrooms for their own personal use. Staff have a designated restroom on each floor which they can use when needed and should not be using a residents bathroom. R1 was unable to confirm whether any staff were using their restroom. Based on interviews, file review, and observation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated
In regards to the allegation "Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of incidents" it was alleged that R1 had scratches on their arm that were not reported to R1's authorized representative. (8) of (8) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews state that R1 did have a scratch on her arm at one point and it was initially observed by R1s family member. The exact date is not known. Interviews state that R1's family member observed the scratch prior to any staff being aware of it. Since the family member was the first to observe it, the staff could not have known and notified them prior. Interview with R1's hospice agency also was not aware of scratches on R1 until they were notified by R1s family member. Based on interviews, file review, and observation; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Continued on LIC 9099-C |