1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not provide resident a copy of the admission agreement in a timely manner. It was alleged that R1 never received a copy of admission agreement and R1 was not aware of any fees R1 would be responsible for at the time of admission.
Record review confirm that R1 was admitted to the facility on 06/10/2024. Admission Agreement was signed by R1 with the adjusted monthly rate $823.07 (Basic service rate was $1398.07). Interviewed R1 stated that it was misunderstanding about the fees, and they have a copy of Admission Agreement. R1 stated that they agree to the terms of the admission agreement and signed it on 06/10/24, don't have any concerns about this matter. Residents interviewed were not able to corroborate the allegation. All interviewed residents stated that they or their responsible parties did receive copies of their admission agreement and other paperwork in a timely manner. Interviewed S1 and S2 denied the allegation. They stated that they provide copies of resident’s paperwork, including the Admission Agreement to R1 and other residents or their responsible parties in a timely manner, at the time of admission. Also, residents and their responsible parties were informed that copies of resident’s chart could be provided to their request. S1 and S2 stated R1 was interviewed at Rehabilitation Center from where R1 was transferred and was informed about payment obligations. They stated that facility decided to charge less for the rent to help R1 with their finances.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Assistant Administrator Dennise Torres. |