1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA attempted to interview S3 and left a voicemail message. Call was returned on 8/29/2022. At 4:24pm, S3 and Adm called LPA for a 3-way conversation. S3 stated that she refused C1 back due to 2 reasons. One of the reasons was he needed to be quarantined per Pasadena Public Health Dept. guidelines. However, there was no proof that C1 was tested Covid positive at the time. Second reason was he was a danger to himself and a threat to the health and safety of other clients and staff at the facility.
Based on LPA's observations, review of records and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Section cited 85068.5(a)(1-5) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview held. A copy of the report, deficiency citation and appeals rights were provided to Kenia Williams, House Manager. |