1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation: "Facility staff did not properly supervise resident", it is alleged that
at 4pm, facility staff left C1 in the ER waiting room even though C1 had not been admitted yet and had been engaging in self-harm behavior. C1 was in the ER waiting room without facility staff present from 4pm-10pm. Interviewed staff members denied the allegation. S5 stated C1 has been taken to the ER many times due to her recurring wounds caused by C1's behavior. On 11/13/2023, S5 stayed with C1 in the ER and spoke with the medical personnel to answer their questions and instructions about C1. While at the ER, S5 stated that S1 sent him a message to let him know that a Day Program Staff will go to ER willingly and voluntarily to visit C1. As ER only allows one (1) person inside with a patient, the ER nurse told S5 that he can leave and have the Day Program staff come in at around 4pm. Staff interviewed stated that if there is a possibility that client will be admitted, then staff leave client under the nurse’s supervision. Staff interviewed stated that C1 does not have a one-on one caregiver and there was no agreement with the Regional Center requiring that a staff be with the client at the Hospital 24/7. According to S5, before he left, he spoke with the Day program staff who was willing to stay with C1 who also left ER a few hours later. Staff also indicated that they provide adequate supervision to clients when they are at the Hospital. Staff interviewed stated that they hired a temporary sitter/caregiver from the Hospital as soon as C1 was admitted. Client interviewed indicated that a staff from the facility accompanies and stays with her when she goes to the doctor or the Hospital. Client interviewed indicated that there is sufficient staff to provide adequate supervision and monitoring to meet her needs. C1 indicated that she feels safe and comfortable at this facility. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegation.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, client, review of clients files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Anna Marie Tomilloso. |