1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation revealed the following:
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not assist resident with getting off the floor”. It has been alleged that a resident was not assisted out from being stuck between the bed and night stand for an extended period.
Record reviews revealed that four (4) staff (S2, S5-S6, S8) present on the date in question have conducted all required training as a caregiver and as a Med-Tech.
Between 09:40AM and 1:00PM LPA interviewed five (5) staff (S1-S5) and between 2:00PM and 4:30PM LPA interviewed three (3) staff (S6-S8), four (4) residents (R1-R4) and one witness (W1). R4 was not available to be interviewed, due to current medical status. S1 was not able to answer LPA's questions, as that is beyond their work duties. Seven (7) out of Eight (8) staff (S2-S8), Three (3) out of three (3) residents (R1-R3) and one (1) witness (W1) interviewed have denied the allegation has taken place. Seven (7) out of Eight (8) staff (S2-S8) have provided accurate details on emergency protocol.
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not check on resident in a timely manner”. It is being alleged that a resident was discovered stuck between the bed and night stand. Record reviews revealed that four (4) staff (S2, S5-S6, S8) present on the date in question have conducted all required training as a caregiver and as a Med-Tech.
Between 09:40AM and 1:00PM LPA interviewed five (5) staff (S1-S5) and between 2:00PM and 4:30PM LPA interviewed three (3) staff (S6-S8), four (4) residents (R1-R4) and one witness (W1). R4 was not available to be interviewed, due to current medical status. S1 was not able to answer LPA's questions, as that is beyond their work duties. Seven (7) out of Eight (8) staff (S2-S8), Three (3) out of three (3) residents (R1-R3) and one (1) witness (W1) interviewed have denied the allegation has taken place. S8 notified LPA that if a fall is unwitnessed, staff are not to relocate a resident without the assistance of a skilled medical professional. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
There have been zero (0) deficiencies cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was conducted with Vanita Harris, Business Office Manager (S1), and a copy of this report has been provided. |