1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding the allegation, “Staff are not providing resident with enough food to meet resident's needs”, it has been alleged that a resident is not provided enough protein in their daily diet. On 05/21/25, at around 09:30AM toured the facility’s kitchen and observed three (3) residents’ special dietary orders (R2-R4), located on the cork board as LPA entered the kitchen. At around 1:00PM, LPA collected four residents’ (R1-R4) dietary orders. Upon review of four residents’ dietary orders (DO), R1’s physicians’ DO does not mention any increase in protein for R1. During an interview with R1, R1 mentions that he is provided with about one and a half (1.5) chicken breasts, instead of three (3) chicken breasts as requested. Interviews revealed that three (3) out of four (4) residents and seven (7) out seven (7) staff have not agreed with this allegation. Based on LPA’s observation, record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not safeguard resident's belongings”, it is being alleged that nine (9) residents’ underwear have not been returned after being provided to housekeeper(s). On 05/21/25, at around 1:00PM, LPA requested any documentation of residents’ concerns regarding their personal belongings. LPA reviewed a residents’ safeguard of personal belongings, in which does not mention nine (9) pair of underwear. Interviews revealed that three (3) out of seven (7) residents and seven (7) out seven (7) staff have not agreed with this allegation. Based on LPA’s observation, record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Report continues, please see LIC9099C.
|