1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 06/30/26, the department conducted interviews with R2-R9, and attempted to interview R1, but was unable to as they are no longer in the facility. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 8 residents could not corroborate the allegation. 8 out of 8 residents said they receive three meals a day, snacks in between, and that they have alternative meals as well. 8 out of 8 residents said they receive their breakfast between 7:00 am - 9:00 am, lunch at 12:00 pm, and dinner at 5:00 pm, 7 days a week.
On 06/30/26, during the records review, the department observed copies of the facility’s menu. The facility serves three meals per day: breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and snacks between meals, with an option for alternative meals. Based on the menu reviewed, the facility’s meals appeared consistent with these guidelines and Title 22 food service requirements.
Based on observation, interviews conducted, and a review of records, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident was appropriately clothed. It was alleged that a resident was mistakenly dressed in their roommate's clothing. It is also being alleged that the resident reportedly brought the error to the caregiver's attention and requested to be changed into their own clothing; however, the caregiver allegedly refused to assist with changing the resident into the correct clothing. On 02/25/26, and 06/30/26, the department conducted interviews with S1-S6. Of those interviewed, 6 out of 6 staff could not corroborate the allegation. On 06/30/26, the department conducted interviews with R2-R9, and attempted to interview R1, but was unable to as they are no longer in the facility. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 8 residents could not corroborate the allegation.
Based on observation, interviews conducted, and a review of records, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Continued on LIC9099-C |