1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: "Staff did not safeguard a resident’s belongings." It was alleged that a package for R1 was delivered to the facility on July 19, 2026, with notification that S2 had received it, but the package could not be found. Staff interviewed confirmed that they know that R1 has previously stated that a package that was delivered to the facility is missing. S2 confirmed receiving the package on 07/19/2026 for R1, and stated to have left it on R1's bed in their room the same day. Staff confirmed that they do not have a delivery package tracking system in place or a signed facility inventory list. S1-S2 stated that after R1 complained about the missing package, they started logging the receipt of packages signed by both the residents and facility.
Residents interviewed stated they hardly order items online, and if they do, they receive it themselves. Documents reviewed revealed that R1 ordered items on 07/17/2026 and 07/19/2026 with proof of delivery reports. The facility confirmed receipt of a package for R1 during interviews and documents reviewed, however the package could not be located due to a lack of tracking system or log. Despite the presence of a video camera in the facility, S1 stated that they do not have a video evidence of the package's arrival or S2 delivering it to R1's room. Therefore, there was sufficient evidence to corroborate with this allegation.
Based on staff interviews, resident interviews and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the administrator, Bryanna Luke along with the appeal rights.
|