1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding allegation: Resident in care was assaulted by unknown individual in the facility.
It is alleged that on Sunday, August 8, 2023 at about 10PM, R1 was using the phone in the staff area and was confronted by a staff named Salvador, who yelled at and hit R1 with two closed fists to the chest, for being in a restricted area. After review of R1’s Physician’s Report, dated: 1/24/23, it was discovered that R1 has an altered mental status and has a history of substance abuse. Per R1's Needs and Serviced Plan, dated: 2/17/23, R1 has frequent outbursts towards other residents and staff due to exhibits of paranoia. It is also noted that R1 is normally alert and oriented, but appears to be disoriented and confused at times due to substance abuse. Per interviews conducted, (3) of (3) staff stated that R1 called the police to report the alleged incident. The police came and investigated the incident with S1, however, it was discovered that there are no staff working at the facility by that name. The police and staff also confirmed through review of surveillance footage that R1 was never in the area during the time R1 stated to have been, when the incident occurred. Per the staff roster, LPA confirmed there is no staff by the name, Salvador. During today's visit, LPA was unable to review surveillance footage for the date of 8/08/23, due to the system keeping footage for the last 30 days only, and no longer available. Per interview with R4, it was stated that R1 told R4 about the incident of staff hitting R1. However, R4 states R4 did not observe any marks on R1 that would indicate R1 was physically assaulted. R4 stated to "personally believe" R1 "hallucinates at times". R1 did not tell R4 who the staff was, where the incident occurred, and when it occurred, but simply stated R1 was hit by a male staff. (4) of (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were cited.
An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Administrator, Alex Solorio, and a copy of this report was provided. |