1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation, Staff are not properly supervising client in care resulting in client sustaining unexplained bruising, it is alleged that beginning on or around April 2023, C5 started sustaining unexplained bruising after attending the facility and there have been incidences observed in April, June, July and August of 2023. It is alleged that these concerns were reported to facility staff and staff did not have an explanation regarding how C5 got the bruising and facility staff just stated that they do not know how it happened or that C5 comes to the facility with the bruising. Interviews conducted with 4 out of 5 clients revealed that staff properly supervise clients in care and staff have never physically hurt them or any client that attends the day program. They stated that staff are very nice and take good care of clients and help them when they need assistance. C5 was not interviewed as client is non verbal. Interviews conducted with 4 staff revealed that staff properly supervise all clients in care. Staff denied that C5 or any other client sustained bruising while attending the day program. Staff stated that that nothing unusual occurred with C5 in April, June, July and August of 2023 that might have caused C5 to sustain bruising. S3 stated that on 08/11/23, as C5 arrived at the program, S3 noticed bruising on C5's right arm from the elbow down. S3 reported their observations to facility supervisor and observations were noted down. Interview conducted with SGPRC SC revealed that their investigation did not reveal that the bruising occurred at the day program or at the home of C5 and also stated that C5 has behaviors such as biting themselves, physical aggression towards others, banging their head and property destruction. Interview with with C5 FM1-2 revealed that C5 does bite themselves on both wrists. LPA's review of C5's IPP corroborated the information regarding self injurious behavior. LPA also observed that C5 takes a medication that might cause bruising.
During facility tour, LPA observed clients participating in activities and did not observe anything of concern. LPA observed the facility to be clean during the time of the visit and did not observe any items obstructing any doors or passageways. Based on statements gathered from interviews conducted with staff, SGPRC staff, C5 FM1-2 and LPA observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided to Program Manager Vanessa Mejia. |