1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It is also alleged that C1 did not provoke the C2 to get his in the face and that C2 was saying racist comments towards C1, got too close and C2 ended up punching C1 in the face. LPA interviewed one (1) staff that denied the allegation stating on witnessing the incident on 01/17/2026 by hearing a noise of a slap and immediately intervened the physical altercation by de-escalating and separating both C1 and C2. One (1) staff observed the right side of C1’s cheek was red and LPA reviewed LPA reviewed the shift notes dated 01/17/2026 that had a photo of C1’s face. Per Administrator, C1 was provided by staff an ice pack for the red mark on C1's face at the time of the incident. LPA also reviewed SIR (Special Incident Report) that on 01/17/2026, C1 had a physical altercation with another client and refused medical treatment at the time of the incident and did not wish to contact law enforcement. LPA interviewed the Administrator, and an additional three (3) out of three (3) staff that all denied the allegation stated not witnessing the physical altercation between C1 and C2 on 01/17/2026 but stated that whenever clients are involved in a physical altercation, the staff immediately intervene, separate, and re-direct the clients. LPA interviewed C1 that denied the allegation stating that there was a verbal and physical altercation between C1 and C2 and that both clients were yelling at each other but staff immediately intervened and de-escalated the situation by separating both C1 and C2. C1 also stated sustaining a red mark on right cheek so C1 received an ice pack by the staff to apply on C1’s face but refused further medical treatment at the time of the incident and did not wish to contact law enforcement. LPA attempted to interview C2 but C2 refused to be interviewed. LPA interviewed an additional eight (8) out of eight (8) clients who denied the allegation by stating not witnessing the physical altercation between both C1 and C2 that occurred on 01/17/2026. However, six (6) out of eight (8) clients stated that staff immediately intervene and de-escalate verbal or physical altercations by separating the clients. Two (2) out of eight (8) clients stated that they have not witnessed any physical or verbal altercations at the facility. Eight (8) out of eight (8) clients also stated feeling safe at the facility. LPA reviewed ongoing staff training in-services on Mandated Reporting and Resident Rights in file. There was insufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegation.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Estefany Lopez. |