1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During today's visit, LPA Maldonado obtained a copy of the resident and staff roster, and conducted interviews with Residents# 2-6 (R2-R6). LPA was unable to interview Resident# 1 (R1) due to R1 no longer residing at the facility.
The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding allegation: Staff did not respond to facility alarm in a timely manner.
It is alleged that memory care staff were observed to not respond to the memory care unit alarm system in a timely manner, when it was prompted. On 3/02/23 at 9:50AM, with assistance of S1, LPA pushed the doorbell for assistance, which is located at the entrance doors of the locked memory care unit on the second floor. After 3 minutes, it was noted that staff did not arrive at the door to open it for LPA and S1. LPA then proceeded to push the delayed egress door to sound the alarm and try to gain entry. After 1 minute of the alarm sounding, a staff came from a room located around the corner, outside of the memory care unit, to input a key code on the side of the door. The alarm turned off and entry was given to LPA and S1. Upon entering the second floor memory care unit, housekeeping staff were observed cleaning the hallway and no residents or other staff were observed on the floor. LPA and S1 met with all memory care staff and residents on the first floor activity room. During interviews conducted on 3/02/23, (5) of (5) staff state that the delayed egress alarm on the second floor could not be heard on the first floor, which is why no memory care staff arrived to open the door or turn off the alarm. (3) of (5) staff also stated that due to being short-staffed, all staff and residents are on the first floor for most of the day to allow closer supervision of residents in care. (2) of (5) staff stated it is not due to being short-staffed but rather to allow closer supervision of residents. During interviews conducted with resident's during today's visit, (5) of (5) residents could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is Substantiated.
Based on LPA's observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is Substantiated- this allegation did not change since the original report dated: 03/02/23.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, deficiencies were cited on the LIC9099-D, with the original date of: 3/02/23 and citations have been cleared.
An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, Carla Mariano, and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. |