1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 3/24/21 LPA interviewed Administrator Aharon Striks over the telephone. He stated R1 and her responsible party was given a 30 days eviction notice. He stated R1 is being evicted for breaking house rules. He stated letter was sent to licensing on 3/16/21.
LPA conducted a file review of facility’s Plan of Operation. The admissions agreement indicated a resident displaying a change in health physically/mentally will need a Re-appraisals and a meeting with the resident and appropriate individuals to the change. Upon reviewing R1 file, LPA did not see a meeting conducted with R1or Responsible Party. Facility’s Eviction Policy stated they may provide a 30-day eviction notice to resident and responsible person. They will also need to notify licensing agency within 5 days. Based on interviews and files reviewed the administrator did not adhere to their eviction procedure outline in their Plan of Operation.
Substantiated: Based on LPA's observations, file reviews and interviews with administrators and staff which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division (6) and Chapter (2) are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D.
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a hard copy of the report and appeals rights was provided via email for records
|