1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 07/11/24, between 09:30 - to 01:30 pm, the Department interviewed (2) out of (2) assistant administrator #1 (A1) and staff #1 (S1) who confirmed that the facility does provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident in care. (A1-S1) claimed that there is no type of abuse at this facility and had no concerns. (A1) indicated only recent incidents were between (R1 and R2) with no physical assault and only verbal disagreements with one another. (A1) reported there is 24/7 care and supervision are provided by staff. According to (A1), the facility is equipped with surveillance cameras used to protect residents, staff, and visitors. It is added protection to deter away any activities of theft, vandalism break-ins, or any unwarranted activities.
On 07/11/24, between 01:30 pm – 01:59 pm, the Department inspected (R1’s) room #218 and (R2’s) room #229 including the common areas and observed surveillance cameras on the premises. Based on the gathered information, there is no evidence to corroborate the allegation mentioned above.
Based on the information collected, an inspection of the facility, observation and interviews conducted, and an analysis of records reviewed, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned in this complaint. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview is conducted with Ella Naygas, and a copy of the report is provided. |