1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding the allegation, “Unlawful Eviction”, it is being alleged that a resident has received an eviction notice that was taped on their door upon a resident’s return to the facility. Interviews revealed the following; six (6) residents (R2 through R7) and all four (4) staff (S1 through S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. R1 has stated that they received the document during the evening of 07/02/25. Record reviews have indicated the following: a resident has received a “Thirty day notice to quit premises” (dated: 06/26/25) from “Dennis P. Block & Associates, APC”. Our division, Community Care Licensing (CCL) has not received any notification of any eviction notice related to a resident in question. The dates reviewed and dates provided do not match. This “eviction” does not meet This document has not been signed, nor does it include Title 22, Eviction Procedures 87224(a)(1-4). Interviews have revealed six (6) out of seven (7) (R2-R7) and all four staff (S1-S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not ensure resident receives mail in a timely manner”, it is being alleged that a resident does not receive their mail. Interviews revealed the following: Three (3) residents (R4. R6, R7) have agreed the allegation has taken place, while one resident (R4) is not sure. All four staff (S1-S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. LPA observations revealed the following: On 07/09/25, around 11am, LPA observed the United States Postal Service dropping off residents’ mail. Throughout the day, LPA did observe staff providing mail to residents in care as each resident passed by the front lobby. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
There have been two (2) deficiencies cited during today's visit. Please see LIC9099D.
During today's visit, there have been two (2) deficiencies cited. Please see LIC9099D. An exit interview was held with Cesilia Torres - Assistant Administrator and a copy of facilities' appeal rights, the deficiencies cited, plans of corrections and a copy of this report has been provided. |