1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation: Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings. It is being alleged that staff did not prevent a resident’s clothing, Cochlear Implant processor and replacement from being stolen. On 03/19/26, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with S1-S4. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 staff denied the allegation. An interview with S1 revealed that they advise residents to label all of their belongings. S1 said that all residents are advised to lock their room doors when leaving their room, and that they all have a key to their room. S1 said that such clothing, or Cochlear Implant processor were never reported missing. S1 said all they can do is enforce good behavior and continuously give the residents advice.
On 03/19/26, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with R1-R5. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 residents could not corroborate the allegation. 5 out of 5 residents interviewed stated that none of their personal belongings had been missing or stolen.
Based on observations, and interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
For the allegation: Staff locked a resident out of the facility. It is being alleged that staff have engaged in illegal lockouts of residents. On 03/19/26, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with S1-S4. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 4 staff denied the allegation. An interview with S1 revealed that the front door is locked at 7:00 PM for safety purposes. S1 stated that residents are instructed to ring the doorbell, at which time staff will open the door and allow entry. S1 further stated that residents are able to enter the facility through either the front or side door at all times.
On 03/19/26, LPA Gonzalez conducted interviews with R1-R5. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 residents could not corroborate the allegation. 5 out of 5 residents said they have not been locked out of the facility.
Based on observations, and interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Continued on LIC9099-C |