1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 9/23/21, LPA conducted interview with supervisor Johnson. He stated the elevator has not been in operation since 8/18/21. He stated the original elevator company was no longer in services and had to locate a new company. He stated they have a contract with a new elevator company that will come out tomorrow to start work. LPA reviewed the contract which was a “Monthly Service Contract”. Contract did not indicate any invoice or notice on when elevator will be repaired. On 11/4/21, LPA interviewed Administrator Ella Nayqas and she stated the elevator has been down for 2 months. She stated the elevator company is waiting on a part and there is a problem with the shipping. She did not know when the elevator will be working but stated she has been contacting them every day.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D.
Exit Interview Conducted, appeal rights were explained and a copy of this report was provided to Torres
|