1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted interviews with the administrator, Staff, and C-1. The 3 staff on duty during the incident denied wrestling or touching C-1. Per staff interviews, Staff #1 (S-1) and Staff #2 (S-2) were in the kitchen discussing the menu. C-1 came over and accused them of talking about him/her. C-1 became enraged, threw a sandal at staff, and charged towards S-2. S-1 intervened by standing in the middle to block C-1 from striking S-2. S-2 ran outside to inform another Staff (S-3) and was instructed to call 911. The other 2 staff proceeded to talk to C-1 to calm client down and denied pushing or holding down C-1. They checked C-1 and asked if there were any injuries after the incident. C-1 was given an ice pack for the pain indicated on the hand, but client refused to go to the hospital for medical assessment. Staff stated they did not observe any body parts bruised or swollen. The police responded to the incident and C-1 did not report any injuries to them either.
According to the administrator and staff, C-1 has a history of aggressive behavior and had attacked staff in the past. C-1’s behavioral progress reports show the facility is working with client to reduce problem behaviors such as physical aggression, emotional outburst, just to name a few, and to increase appropriate behaviors. Staff have CPI training, which consists of verbally redirecting, giving space, and using coping skills, to handle C-1’s behaviors. They cannot hold down the client but could utilize blocking techniques when C-1 strikes. Based on the information gathered, Staff did not engage in any physical altercation and caused injury to the client.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Jennifer Ogudu. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided. |