1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation “facility neglected resident's call requests after sustaining a fall," it was alleged that staff did not respond to multiple call button requests for assistance from resident after sustaining a fall. LPA attempted to interview resident#1 but unable to interview since resident discharged on 10/17/22 and responsible party did not answer LPA's multiple calls. Four (4) out of five (5) residents stated it took staff about 30 minutes or more to respond their call button requests and come to residents' room to assist residents. One (1) out of five (5) residents stated it took about 3 minutes for staff to come to assist. Interviewed staff from staff#1 to staff #6 and they denied the allegation. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied the allegation. Three (3) staff stated staff did not respond to resident#1's call button request on 10/1/22 because R1 did not press the call button for help. The call button was pressed by staff who found R1 after sustaining a fall. LPA toured the facility with administrator and went to room #110 and #112 to test the call button requests, staff responded and came to the residents’ room in 5 minutes. However, resident interviews revealed facility did not respond resident's call requests on a timely basis to assist residents.
Regarding the allegation “facility staff failed to seek medical evaluation to resident after sustaining a fall," it was alleged that facility staff did not seek a medical evaluation for resident#1 after sustaining a fall. Five (5) out of five (5) residents could not corroborate the allegation.
Five (5) out of six (6) staff stated they did not seek a medical evaluation for resident#1 after sustaining a fall. File reviews revealed facility did not seek medical evaluation after the incident on 10/1/22. Therefore, staff failed to seek medical evaluation to resident after sustaining a fall.
Based on review of documents and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |