1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation #1 - Staff did not notify resident’s authorized representative of incident involving resident. Administrator Biely stated that when there are any incidents involving their residents, they would report to the authorized representative immediately or as soon as they could. She indicated that the Resident #1’s (R1) mini stroke that occurred in December 2020 was reported to the resident’s responsible party via telephone call. LPA verified with R1’s responsible party that this incident was reported when it occurred. Interviews with caregivers stated that with any usual incidents, they would inform either the MedTech or head nurse and one of them will inform the families. They do not know how soon the families are notified as they do not follow up with the incident reports. LPA interviewed the MedTech who stated that families/responsible parties are contacted right away and depending on the type of incidents, doctors are also contacted.
Allegation #2 - Staff did not provide assistance to resident in a timely manner. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had to wait over an hour to be assisted with the bathroom. The Administrator and staff interviewed denied that it ever took over an hour to assist R1 to the bathroom. Staff reported that they would assist as quickly as possible when a resident pulls the call cord from the room or press the pendant. The MedTech will also assist caregivers when they are busy so that residents are tend to immediately. They do round checks about every 2 hours. 4 out of 5 residents interviewed stated that the staff provide assistance whenever they ask and would respond in a reasonable amount of time. One of the resident is independent and does not ask for assistance.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and left with Mr. Yoshisato, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents. |