1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | **This is a subsequent visit to amend and supersede the reports dated 02/24/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. **
Regarding the allegation: Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. It is alleged that R1 is experiencing progressive behavioral expressions related to dementia and the facility is not addressing the changes in R1's condition and should have R1 placed in memory care or higher-level care facility. Seven (7) out of seven (7) staff interviewed denied this allegation. According to staff, R1 resides in assisted living program at the facility. Assistance is provided with housekeeping, medications, and daily living needs only, R1 is high functioning person and can comprehend and express their needs and concerns. Staff responsible for tracking change in health conditions are charting the residents’ health and medications changes and needs and are reporting to the residents POA/primary physician as needed. Progress notes are made by each caregiver/med tech that interacts with residents under their care. According to staff the POA have been provided other placement agencies that cater to dementia resident’s needs. Ten (10) out of ten (10) residents interviewed could not collaborate this allegation. According to couple of residents stated their needs and changes with their health conditions are communicated to their doctor, family and POA and they have not had any concerns with staff communicating their medical issues and needs. One resident stated, the caregivers have prevented serious health condition by informing their doctor and getting medical assistance right away. Other residents stated caregivers and med-techs are involved with our health and wellbeing. LPA attempted to interview R1’s personal caregiver/assistant hired by the R1’s POA, they declined. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Staff did not inform resident's representative of incident(s) as required. It is alleged that the facility staff are not informing R1’s POA of incidents that happen with R1. Seven (7) out of seven (7) staff deny this allegation, staff state that resident’s behavioral are charted in the progress notes and communicated to the next staff- med-techs and caregivers, when residents fall ill, health conditions are communicated to responsible parties.
Continued on 809C... |