1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviewed with resident#1, resident could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interview revealed that resident was not aware of change of prescription or medication from resident’s primary doctor. Six (6) out of six (6) staff denied the allegation. Staff interviews, including interviews of pharmacies and primary doctor, revealed resident’s prescription did not need to change and would continue July prescription when finished medication supply from hospital pharmacy in August. File review revealed R1 would continue July prescription in September. During resident interview, LPA did not observe issues or resident complained about resident’s medication. Therefore, resident’s prescription remained and dispensed as prescribed.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of this report was provided. |