1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The prescription from pharmacy shows that the Furosemide 20 mg was ordered on 9/22/21 and filled on 9/27/21 and Lorazepam .5 mg was ordered and filled on 9/22/21. MAR logs reveal that R1 was given Furosemide 20 mg starting on 9/27/21 and Lorazepam is given as needed. When interviewed, the physician (P1) stated that Lorazepam was delivered to the facility on 9/22/21, but there was a delay in Furosemide because the pharmacy had to verify with the physician if this was a change in dosage or to be given concurrently with higher dosage (Furosemide 40 mg). P1 stated that Furosemide 20 mg was filled and delivered to facility on 9/27/21. All staff interviewed denied the allegation that staff refused to assist resident with their medication management. Staff stated that the facility was not informed about the change in medications but S2 called the pharmacy on 9/22/21 to verify when R1 inquired about the new medications. Staff stated that once the new medications were verified and delivered to the facility, they were given as prescribed. A review of the MAR logs and LPA's observation of the medications verify that the medications were present at the facility and given as prescribed. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed stated that staff assist them with their medications and they receive all of their medications as prescribed.
Staff failed to provide adequate laundry service
It was alleged that facility staff failed to provide adequate laundry service due to clothes and sheets having odor and stains after being washed. Per review of laundry service, each residents laundry is cleaned once per week. The admissions agreement states that residents have independent access to washers and dryers and additional laundry and housekeeping services are available. LPA observed the laundry rooms and the detergents used, as well as the extra set of linens which appeared clean and did not have an odor. LPA also observed the linens and clothes for a random sample of seven residents and the linens appeared clean and did not have an odor. The administrator and S1 denied that the facility does not provide adequate laundry service stating that laundry services are done once a week, while S2-S4 do not work with housekeeping and were unaware of the issue. The administrator stated that most residents prefer to do their own laundry, but sheets are changed as needed or at least every 3 days. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed stated that they are satisfied with laundry services provided and have not noticed odor or stains in laundry.
Based upon interviews, observation, and records reviewed, the findings indicate although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a hard copy of the report was provided. |