1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regard of the allegation, “staff searched resident's personal property without consent” it was alleged that administrator went through resident#1’s purse around September 2022 without resident#1’s consent. The investigation revealed the following: Interviewed with resident#1(R1), resident stated administrator searched R1's purse and claimed that a check was missing but no documentary proof. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed revealed that administrator or staff had never gone through their personal property without resident’s consent. Six (6) out of six (6) staff, including the administrator, denied the allegation. File review revealed resident#1 did not report any personal property missing during September 2022. Therefore, there is not a preponderance evidence to prove the administrator had searched resident’s personal property.
In regard of the allegation, “Facility is in disrepair” it was alleged that facility had a history of not fixing items. The investigation revealed the following: Interviewed with resident#1, resident said there were a broken blind in resident’s room in the past. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed revealed that their rooms not in disrepair. Six (6) out of six (6) staff, including the administrator, denied the allegation. LPA tour the facility during resident interview, LPA did not observe the facility had broken items. Therefore, there is not a preponderance evidence to prove the facility is in disrepair.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of this report was provided. |