1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed residents, four (4) out of seven (7) residents stated facility staff and staff#3 (S3) refused to assist residents to provide care. Three (3) out of seven (7) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Five (5) out of seven (7) staff interviewed stated staff had refused to help residents for care. Two (2) out of seven (7) staff denied the allegation. Thus, facility staff had refused to assist residents.
In regard of allegation, “staffs are not meeting residents needs in a timely manner,” it was alleged that residents have to wait a long for getting staff's help. LPA interviewed residents, seven (7) out of seven (7) residents stated they would usually wait for 15 - 30 minutes for staff assistance after called for help. Five (5) out of seven (7) staff interviewed stated staff may not attend and help residents timely. Two (2) out of seven (7) staff denied the allegation. During the visit, LPA conducted tests by calling the facility intercom and timed the staff's arrival time to residents' room. It took 20 minutes for staff to arrive to residents’ room. Therefore, there was preponderance of evidence to show facility staff did not assist residents timely.
Based on LPA's observations, record reviews and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 on LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Gil and Assisted administrator, Justin Lee. A hard copy of this report and appeal right were provided. |