1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per residents’ interviews, all eight (8) residents corroborate with the allegation. It revealed that residents’ meals did not have enough vegetable and fresh fruit. Per staff interviews, two (2) out of five (5) staff denied the allegation. Three (3) out of five (5) staff corroborate with the allegation. Per kitchen tour, food supplies on vegetable and fresh fruit were low. Thus, food services to residents were not adequate.
In regard of allegation, “staff did not ensure resident's room has a call button,” it was alleged that resident’s room did not have a working call button. Per residents’ interviews, seven (7) out of eight (8) residents did not corroborate with the allegation. One (1) out of eight (8) residents corroborate with the allegation. Per the facility tour, R1’s room did not have a working call button. Per staff interviews, five (5) out of five (5) staff denied the allegation. Therefore, resident’s room did not have a working call button.
Based on LPA's observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Refer to 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Gil Agas and findings were discussed. A copy this report and appeal rights were provided to Administrator at time of visit. |