1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation of: resident is deny access to personal storage space, it was alleged that facility did not provide storage space to resident. Five (5) out of six (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interviews from R2 through R6 revealed that they have sufficient storage space in their rooms and additional storage rooms were provided as needed. All five (5) staff interviewed had denied the allegation. Per observation, resident’s personal properties were stored in resident’s room and an additional storage room. Thus, the facility had provided resident with personal storage space.
In regards to the allegation of: facility is not assisting resident with diabetic needs, it was alleged staff did not check resident’s sugar level daily and insulin was not provided as needed. Five (5) out of six (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Residents stated Med Tech checked residents’ sugar level and administered insulin as needed. All five (5) staff interviewed had denied the allegation. Staff stated resident was forgetful and could not recall whether resident had blood sugar checked or had insulin provided. Per record reviews, Med Tech had records to log residents’ blood sugar level and insulin injection on a daily basis. Thus, the facility had assisted resident with diabetic needs.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of this reports were provided. |