1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 01/02/24. The finding had changed to Unsubstantiated. ***
On 02/12/24, LPA Tao conducted another subsequent visit. During the visit, LPA obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, and delivered findings.
Investigation consisted of the following: interviews of staff from staff#1 (S1) to staff#4 (S4); interviews of residents from Resident#2 (R2) through Resident#5 (R5); attempted to interview resident #1(R1); reviewed resident#1’s record reviews, and a facility tour.
In regard of the allegation: staff is financially abusing resident in care, it was alleged that a resident damaged the facility’s entrance door and the facility charged resident for replacing the damaged door. The investigation revealed the following: LPA attempted to interview resident#1(R1), all attempts failed. All four (4) residents (R2-R5) interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interviews revealed that residents did not pay for repairing or replacing the damaged properties if they had broken any. Two (2) out of four (4) staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Two (2) out of four (4) staff interviewed indicated a resident was advised to pay for replacing the damaged property since it was damaged by the resident's electric scooter. Per record review, a resident broke the entrance door in 2023 and made multiple small payments of a total of $270 to the facility for replacing it. Staff stated facility did not force resident to pay the full repairing cost but made payments at her own pace. Per review of the Admission Agreement and Electric Scooter Addendum, it stated residents were responsible for the cost of repairing the damaged facility property if the property was damaged by residents' electric scooters in the facility. Per facility’s property insurance coverages of 2023, the facility had insurance coverage for repairing the damaged property at the facility. Therefore, facility did not financially abuse resident.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there’s not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Gil Agas. A hard copy of this licensing report LIC 9099s was provided. |