1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32  | The investigation revealed the following: 
Interviews with S1-S2 revealed, they have not threatened to remove nor evict client.  S1 stated, although they did discuss monthly rent payment policies with C1, they did not issue an eviction notice.  S2 stated, they had a discussion with C1 regarding C1 ensuring their full rent portion is paid on time, however, S2 has not mentioned anything regarding a potential eviction nor issued an eviction notice to C1.  Interview with C1 revealed, staff have not threatened nor have provided them with an eviction notice.  C1 indicted they heard wrong and the incident didn't happen. 
 
 
Based on record review and interviews conducted, the findings indicate, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.  
 
Exit interview conducted with Virgilio Agas, Administrator, and copy of the report was provided during visit.         |