1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 10/25/24. The findings changed to un-substantiated. ***
Regarding the allegation of an excluded individual is working as the licensee’s business partner, it was alleged the an excluded person was working as a business partner. Per interviews with Licensee Dr. Kang on 10/16/24 and 10/18/24, Licensee confirmed the excluded individual did not work as Licensee's business partner. Per the interviews with administrator and administrator assistant, they could not corroborate the allegation. Per record reviews, records did not show the excluded individual was working as Licensee's business partner. Therefore, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the excluded individual is working as licensee's business partner.
Regarding the allegation of facility has no liability insurance, it was alleged that the facility did not have an active liability insurance coverage. Per record reviews, the facility had liablity insurance coverage with effective date started on 05/20/24 to 05/20/25. Therefore, the facility had a current liability insurance coverage.
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, interviews with staff, residents, review of resident files and LPA's observation, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support the allegations mentioned above.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Gil Agas and findings were discussed. A copy this report was provided to Administrator at time of visit. |