1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect. It was alleged that S2 and S3 yelled at R1. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted interviews with six (6) residents and three (3) staff members. LPA’s interview with R1 revealed they do not like certain staff including S2. Let it be noted during LPA’s interview with R1, two (2) staff members, who disclosed their names to LPA (S4 and S5) arrived to assist R1 with their call pendant being activated. Once they left, R1 stated S2 was one of the two (2) staff members. However, LPA’s interview with S1 revealed S2 is not working today nor present in the facility. LPA’s interview with five (5) of the six (6) residents interviewed revealed they have not been yelled at by staff nor have they witnessed staff to yell at other residents. LPA’s interview with R4 revealed if staff were to yell at them, “…they would yell right back” and their experience with the staff has been, “Great”. LPA attempted to interview S2, but they were not present during LPA’s visit. LPA attempted to interview S3, but S1 revealed there is no person by said name working at the facility. LPA’s record review of the facility’s Personnel Report, confirmed there to be no staff member by the alleged name provided within the complaint.
Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Staff did not meet resident's incontinence needs. It was alleged staff are not meeting R1’s incontinence needs. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with three (3) incontinence residents. LPA’s interview with R1, revealed when staff have changed them, they have placed their brief on backwards and/or, “…too tight”. LPA’s interview with two (2) of the three (3) residents revealed staff help them with their diapering and showering needs with no complaints mentioned. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed R1 is alert and can make their needs know. Additionally, S1 stated that R1 can use their call pendant to call for assistance regarding their toileting needs.
LPA’s record review of R1’s Medical Assessment for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly, revealed R1 does not have cognitive issues and under Self-Care they are documented to be, “able to communicate” their needs. Further record review of R1’s Level of Care plan revealed R1 to be, “…independent with verbalizations and able to make needs know”. During LPA’s visit, LPA observed two (2) staff members assisting R1. Additionally, LPA observed R1’s call pendent to be located near them. During LPA’s visit, LPA did not observe residents’ rooms, including R1’s room, to omit odor.
Based on interviews, record review, and observations there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (Continue to LIC 9099-C)
|