1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (3) of (3) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (3) of (3) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Interviews stated that facility does have the most current MAR for all clients in care. Staff interviewed denied that there are any false signatures on the MAR and it is accurate. An updated MAR was received by the facility for 1 page related to C1's medications and that was because it had originally been missing the RX number for C1's ear drop medication. Interviews stated that staff would sign over any signatures onto the updated MAR sheet and signatures would not be forged. LPA reviewed the MAR on file for all clients for the last 2 months. Based on interviews, observations and files reviewed, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation "Staff do not ensure that resident(s) are provided their medication(s) as necessary" it was alleged that C1 did not receive their medication as needed on 3/19/24. (3) of (3) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (3) of (3) Clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Allegation details provided stated that the facility did not provide C1 their ear drop medication on 3/19/24 for the morning dose. Interviews with staff stated that C1 could not have been provided the morning dosage of that medication as the medication was not dropped off by the pharmacy until the afternoon of that day. File review shows a delivery receipt of the medication for C1 being dropped off 1:39pm on 3/19/24. The medication would then be provided the following medication window which was around 5pm. File review shows C1 receiving the medication as prescribed after it arrived to the facility. Based on interviews, observations and files reviewed, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
|