1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Maldonado inspected the food supplies during today’s visit and observed a variety of perishable and non-perishable nutritious food such as cereals, fruits, vegetables, proteins, and was in a sufficient amount for clients in care. LPA Maldonado also observed (2) clients at the home during today’s visit to have lunch. Their lunch consisted of a sandwich, a soup with meat and vegetables, a side of fruit, and a cup of orange juice. (2) of (2) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding allegation: Resident's dental care needs were not being met.
It is alleged that due to C1 not being provided nutritious foods at the facility, C1 developed cavities. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegations and stated that C1 was assisted brushing their teeth daily, as it was part of C1’s care plan. Per S1, S1 and C1’s family were responsible for taking C1 to regular appointments. S1 is aware of C1 developing cavities while in care, but denied it being the fault of facility staff, although C1’s family blamed the facility. S2 stated to have helped C1 directly with brushing and flossing C1’s teeth daily. Per C1’s IPP, Pre-Placement Appraisal, and Physician’s Report, it is noted that C1 did require the assistance with personal hygiene. Per C1’s IPP, C1’s needs were being met at the facility. Dental records provided indicate that C1 visited the dentist regularly. (2) of (2) clients could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Regarding allegation: Resident's mattress was not placed appropriately.
It is alleged that during a visit at the facility on 08/04/21, C1’s family noted that C1’s bed did not feel right and found the spring side of the mattress to be on the up-side. S1 stated C1’s family brought this to their attention and S1 noted that staff were cleaning the mattress and accidentally left it on the wrong side but corrected it immediately. Moreover, S1 decided to purchase a new mattress for C1, but was unable to use it due to C1 moving out of the facility following the complaint. During the tour of the facility conducted on today’s visit, LPA Maldonado inspected C1’s old bedroom and observed the new mattress still in the plastic wrap, placed on top of C1’s old bed. LPA also observed all client rooms to be fully furnished with all the required furniture. S2 stated to not have been at the facility when the incident occurred. However, S2 was made aware of it and stated that S1 purchased a new bed altogether, for C1. But, C1 left before the new bed was delivered. (2) of (2) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged. Therefore, the complaint investigation of the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies were observed or cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 during today's visit.
Exit interview was held with Administrator Peter Munzon and a copy of this report was provided. |