1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation: Facility did not provide nutritious meals for resident.
It is alleged that due to C1 eating Domino’s Pizza daily for two months, which is not nutritious, C1 developed and ulcer, a hernia, and several cavities. (2) of (2) staff interviewed stated that nutritious meals are cooked and provided to clients daily. S1 stated to be unaware of C1 developing any health conditions during C1’s stay at the facility. S1 and C1’s family would regularly take C1 to medical appointments. However, when C1’s family took C1 to the doctor, S1 was not provided information regarding the outcome of the appointments. Per C1's last IPP, dated: 10/28/2019, it is noted that C1 did have a cavity that required filling, however there is no indication that the facility was serving non-nutritious food, nor that this was the cause for the cavity. No medical records and/or other information was provided that would support the allegation. LPA Maldonado inspected the food supplies during the visit on 9/11/23 and observed a variety of perishable and non-perishable nutritious food such as cereals, fruits, vegetables, proteins, and was in sufficient amounts for clients currently in care. LPA Maldonado also observed (2) clients at the home during the visit to have lunch. Their lunch consisted of a sandwich, a soup with meat and vegetables, a side of fruit, and a cup of orange juice. (4) of (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding allegation: Resident's dental care needs were not being met.
It is alleged that due to C1 not being provided nutritious foods at the facility, C1 developed cavities. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegations and stated that C1 was assisted brushing their teeth daily, as it was part of C1’s care plan. After review of C1's IPP, it has been noted that C1 requires prompts to complete steps in brushing C1's teeth and staff do hand-over-hand prompting and try to fade out after. Per S1, S1 and C1’s family were responsible for taking C1 to regular appointments. S1 is aware of C1 developing cavities while in care, but denied it being the fault of facility staff, although C1’s family blamed the facility. Per C1's last IPP, dated: 10/28/2019, it is noted that C1 did have a cavity that required filling, however there is no indication that the facility was serving non-nutritious food, nor that this was the cause for the cavity. S2 stated to have helped C1 directly with brushing and flossing C1’s teeth daily. Per C1’s IPP, Pre-Placement Appraisal, and Physician’s Report, it is noted that C1 did require the assistance with personal hygiene. Per C1’s IPP, C1’s needs were being met at the facility. Dental records provided indicate that C1 visited the dentist regularly. (4) of (4) clients could not corroborate the allegation. This allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged. Therefore, the complaint investigation of the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies were observed or cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 during today's visit.
An exit interview was held with DSP, Wilfreda Langa, and a copy of this report was provided. |