1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per document review, C1 had a behavior and threw himself/herself on the concrete, causing scrapes and redness to the mid and lower back. Staff stated that the mark on the back was continuing to be monitored and noted on the body check forms as a previous SIB (self-injurious behavior) since July. Additionally, any new marks observed are noted on the body check forms. Staff stated that the law enforcement officers had conducted a welfare check on 9/15/25 regarding this allegation and reviewed the body check forms. The officers did not observe any bruises on C1’s back. LPA interviewed two (2) clients, who stated they like living at the facility and that staff take good care of them. C1 stated that the staff did not cause any harm to them. Based on the information gathered, there is no supporting evidence to prove that the staff cause the injury to the client.
Allegation - Staff handled the client in a rough manner. It is alleged that a staff member tried to drown Client #1 (C1) by taking the client into the shower, pulling the jacket over the mouth, and pouring water over the client’s head. LPA interviewed the alleged staff, who denied this allegation. Staff also stated that the police officers had interviewed the staff when they visited the facility on 9/15/25. Other staff interviewed stated that C1 has a history of making false statements and that C1 made this allegation because the client wanted to spend more time with the family. Staff stated they are mandated reporters and will report if they observe any staff being rough with clients. LPA interviewed C1 at the facility. C1 told LPA that he/she lied about the allegation and that none of the staff had been rough or tried to drown him/her. LPA toured the facility’s bathroom. LPA did not observe any bathtubs or stoppers on drainage where possible drowning may occur.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with the administrator. A copy of this report, along with the appeal rights, was provided. |