1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regard to the allegation “Facility not following client's dietary restrictions”, it is alleged client was given sugar against his/her dietary plan. During interviews with Administrator and staff four (4) out of four (4) stated that C1 did not have any orders or dietary restrictions. Staff did state that they followed the wishes of no sugar and would redirect C1 when client would ask for sugary products. During interview with C1 it was revealed that they lied about being allergic to sugar because the affects energy drinks had on him/her.
In regard to the allegation “Staff do not provide residents with adequate laundry service”, it is alleged that clients clothes would smell sour. During interviews with Administrator and staff four (4) out of four (4) stated that clients are encouraged to do own laundry, and staff are there to assist if needed. Staff stated that if clients’ clothes smelled they would just wash again. During interviews with residents two (2) out of two (2) clients stated that they wash their own clothes but if asked staff would help them.
In regard to the allegation “Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care”, it is alleged that staff has made rude comments to clients During interviews with Administrator and staff four (4) out of four (4) stated that they do not speak to clients in a rude manner, nor have they heard any other staff. During interviews with residents two (2) out of two (2) residents stated that staff speak to them respectfully.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Administrator.
|